Oral history of British science

Rotblat, Joseph (34 of 40). National Life Stories Collection: General

  • Add a note
    Log in to add a note at the bottom of this page.
  • All notes
  • My notes
  • Hide notes
Please click to leave a note

The British Library Board acknowledges the intellectual property rights of those named as contributors to this recording and the rights of those not identified.
Legal and ethical usage »

Tags (top 25):
(No tags found for this item)
  • Type

    sound

  • Duration

    00:29:26

  • Shelf mark

    C464/17

  • Subjects

    Physics

  • Recording date

    2000-12

  • Interviewees

    Rotblat, Joseph, 1908-2005 (speaker, male)

  • Interviewers

    Thompson, Katherine (speaker, female)

  • Abstract

    Part 34: JR talks some more about SIPRI and the way it worked - it became best source of correct information on facts. Talks about difficulties with Russian Emelyanov. JR was member of SIPRI board for 5 years - difficulties with later board members. More on JR's involvement with World Health Organisation, his report on radiation other general studies, hospital techniques, problems of Malaria etc. The W.H.O. move to bring in International Court of Justice in Hague on use of nuclear weapons. U.S.A. against it. In 1996 the Court was involved. Pugwash started discussion on biological weapons. Destruction of chemical weapon manufacture was signed in 1997. Not yet about possession of biological weapons.

  • Description

    Nobel Peace Prize-winner and nuclear physicist Joseph Rotblat in conversation about his life and work. A key figure in the development of the atomic bomb, he left the US government's Manhattan Project once it became apparent that Nazi Germany did not have the capability to build a bomb of its own.

  • Related links

    Visit this interviewee's page on the 'Voices of Science' web resource

  • Metadata record:

    View full metadata for this item

Rotblat, Joseph (34 of 40). National Life Stories Collection: General

Please log in to update your playlists.

Can you tell us more about the context of the recording? Or can you share information on its content - timings of key sections or important details? Please add your notes. Uninformative entries may not be retained.

Please log in to leave notes.